Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

That's because glass doesn't take a whole lot of energy in the first place. And it's not like the primary goal of recycling is energy saving.



Rather, it is because electrolytic smelting of bauxite is enormously energy intensive, compared to the melting of sand, glass, or aluminum.


For glass and aluminum, energy saving is the whole game for recycling. If energy were free there'd be no recycling of either.


> And it's not like the primary goal of recycling is energy saving.

Really? And what is the primary goal of recycling glass then?

Fair notice: if you say conservation I'm going to laugh at you.


I would have said reduction of garbage/landfill.


The whole landfill thing has always prayed on human's inability to get to bigger picture. They see a dump and somehow think it'll take over as time goes by.

Dig a hole, put rubbish in it, push dirt on top 50 years later and you get a nice park.

Don't think it's safe for humans on top, even better a guaranteed wildlife refuge.


My town dump still had readable newspapers in the lower levels by the time they thought they could put a park on top.


People take issue with putting sand in landfills?


Yep.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: