What I find really entertaining is that there has been a lot of recent "internet press" regarding modeling social phenomena using toy quantum game theoretical models, and that somehow in these toy models which have a more complicated notion of equilibria, its not really mentioned that
1) these 2 player models are too simple either way to do a satisfactory job of truly modeling / having predictive properties for human behavior.
2) We (humanity) barely understand the full spectra of classical games and the proper complexity of computing equilibria in diverse useful special cases, and given than in general quantum complexity theres at best a quadratic speedup, cf en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grover's_algorithm , I suspect that the extra power is at most a quadratic increase in how succintly you can express any given model (or maybe its fully an exponential boost in the number of states you can succinctly express, only time and science will tell)
1) these 2 player models are too simple either way to do a satisfactory job of truly modeling / having predictive properties for human behavior.
2) We (humanity) barely understand the full spectra of classical games and the proper complexity of computing equilibria in diverse useful special cases, and given than in general quantum complexity theres at best a quadratic speedup, cf en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grover's_algorithm , I suspect that the extra power is at most a quadratic increase in how succintly you can express any given model (or maybe its fully an exponential boost in the number of states you can succinctly express, only time and science will tell)