Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Think of the "consensus" as the embedded state within a communication.

In a feudal society a lord might send a written missive to the King or Queen, and if they did it would contain a ton of horribly polite boilerplate, because the consensus of the time on both sides was that anything less was disrespectful.

It is very possible that your lack of words in a given communication sends a point across that you never intended, even if the point you had in mind also made it across.




Sure, but that doesn't speak to my point that consensus is a component of communication, not its primary aim.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: