People with guns are more likely to get killed than people who are unarmed.
OK, lets looks at the facts. At least, the facts available despite the NRA's diligent shutting down of as much research into the role of guns in American society as possible.
The vast, vast majority of the "research" posted in that post is anecdotal and irrelevant. Just because assault "victims" (did they control for gang-related violence? for obvious malicious intent? etc) had a higher rate of being shot doesn't mean guns are useless.
Same with the "fact" that guns in the home are linked to suicides and assaults and not legitimate home defense. OK? Yeah, that's obvious. But that doesn't control for the fact that many people who purchase guns use them completely responsibly.
I understand you think it's a bad idea that on average, gun crime happens. But none of the "evidence" you posted presents a slam-dunk case for repealing the 2nd Amendment and probably many others (unreasonable search and seizure and the like).
None of this even factors into the whole intent of allowing citizens to own weapons, which is worth a fair amount.
While firearms do provide a means of self-defense, there is also data which suggests there's an association between less firearm laws and higher firearm fatalities:
Home defense, hunting, on-person defense for women in unsafe areas, etc.
But yeah, continue on your screed. Let's not let facts get in the way of a good diatribe.