Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

But Chrome's works better and has been around (and useful for millions) for years. Perhaps they'll move to a JS solution in the future, but if I had to choose between the two right now I'd take the faster more complete one.


>But Chrome's works Citation needed, pdf.js has performed better for me personally than Chrome's viewer.


pdf.js supports PDF indexes (or whatever that's called), but AFAICT Chrome's doesn't.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: