Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Your third argument is fallacious. C++ is gradually incorporating everything you're talking about into the standard. Stroustrop has openly stated that lack of standardized threads were a mistake: you can't get much more environment-specific, model-specific than that.


Stroustrup was referring to the standard library, and he wasn't advocating the inclusion of threads at all costs.

C++ is still guided by the principle that you don't have to pay for what you don't use. That was the crux of my argument, and it continues to be true.


You haven't refuted Linus. You've explained why the world works the way Linus says it does. But the impact is the same.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: