Agreed that his arguments don't direct my practice. I have to agree with Steve Losh in that all the tools for publishing now days correct for this. And it makes the source material easier to read and parse.
Why then does he destroy his argument at the end by rallying his claim on the subjectivity of ugliness. To this day I still find the double space prettier and find print that use it easier to read. 3. is too much of an opinion to claim sound reason.
Why then does he destroy his argument at the end by rallying his claim on the subjectivity of ugliness. To this day I still find the double space prettier and find print that use it easier to read. 3. is too much of an opinion to claim sound reason.