Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

He's still on social media. He just wants a better bullhorn for his own position.

"Around the same time, "Crypto Twitter" was spiraling into a mood that I saw described as "financial nihilism": roughly, that the natural end state of blockchains is gambling, this is good, and if you dislike this and wish for something better then you are a stuck-up elitist prick. Naturally, I had (and continue to have) my intellectual disagreements with both of these trends." (This is the guy behind Ethereum.)

So he built a tool that allowed him to post simultaneously on multiple services. That's not digital minimalism. That's a spamming tool.

 help



Did you even read what he said he liked about it?

> My primary goal in doing this was to support decentralized social media, and to continue to engage with X but in a way that distributes network effect rather than locking it in. But in my months of using Firefly, I found that it also has a different effect: I feel much better using it.

> I suspect the primary reason is that while Firefly allows you to tweet, and see other people's tweets, it is missing one central part of the X interface: The Algorithm™.

What he likes isn't being able to spam multiple networks, he likes the change in the content presented to him.


I use Freetube instead of YouTube exactly because no login, no algorithm, no ads, no sponsored content. Just chronological actual content from channels I care about.

It really is a big difference.

That said I would only -consume- content ripped from YouTube. I have no account and no interest in publishing there.


The purpose of a system is what it does. If it spams multiple networks, that is its purpose.

POSIWID is dumb, but also, why are you ignoring that it reads posts from multiple networks? Why isn't that its purpose?



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: