Exactly. Everything below L4 is _incredibly stressful_ and unpleasant to drive, because you have to be constantly aware and alert without having anything to do.
In the case of Tesla, daring to call such a system "Autopilot" is a breathtaking level of irresponsibility. You are responsible for the vehicle you are driving, practically, morally and legally, even if a companies' marketing and the system itself does its very best to divest you from that simple and obvious truth.
> Everything below L4 is _incredibly stressful_ and unpleasant to drive, because you have to be constantly aware and alert without having anything to do.
Hasn't been my experience for the past year or so, give it a try sometime. Incredibly relaxing and frees up my mind to focus on potential hazards further than just one car length in front of me. Sometimes (don't hate me) frees up my hands/eyes to handle other things that need some temporary attention. Traffic jams, getting cut off by impatient drivers, being stuck behind slow drivers, none of it bothers me. I'm chilling out and talking to my kids and enjoying the scenery.
So basically, you're treating your Tesla as a Level 3 or Level 4 autonomous vehicle, even though its driving system is only Level 2. If you were endangering only yourself, that would be one thing. But you're also endangering other drivers sharing the road.
Pilots still are required to be able to take over immediately for an autopilot system and are responsible and accountable for all those items you list and more.
Calling it autopilot is precisely what it is, calling it self driving would be false marketing.
Shrug, assume bad faith if you want to. It’s exactly how I read it when it was first marketed. I didn’t think it met that definition then at the time, but these days it’s pretty close. Plug in a destination and it works until it hits an exception it can’t handle.
Autonomous driving is something entirely different in my mind. That would be a car good enough to work without driver controls or a remote operator. Nothing on the market meets this definition today.
With this line of reasoning I can sell any car as a plane without wings. It flies, but only off a cliff, and doesn't land, but I only said it flies, not that it lands.
Most people expect other things from something marketed as flying, but specialists know that this is exactly how most things fly. And lawyers know to read the fine print.
/s and argumentum ad absurdum, sorry for eristic tricks.
The "Autopilot" argument is ~5 years old. Teslas no longer have that feature.
The current FSD system has no relation to the old Autopilot, is enormously better, and very pleasant to use. A year ago FSD was nice, but I had to take over occasionally. This year it's much better, and I've yet to see a weakness, aside from some parking issues.
Yes, a "Full Self Driving" system which is not fully self-driving is certainly an improvement over an autopilot that does not auto-pilot. Ain't progress grand.
