> the ai company does not explicitly train agents to hack
Ridiculous. The AI company furnished all of the training data and instructed the agent to imbibe all the training data. Ergo, the AI company absolutely did explicitly train the agent how to hack.
Even if, for the sake of argument, we stipulate that the hacking skills were unintended emergent behaviour, there is no way to argue that this company was unaware their agents possessed the skills and a willingness to employ them.
i think you misunderstand what i said.
as much as i dislike ai ceos, i doubt anyone is setting out to build ai with explicit intent to do crime.
they are just not doing a great job preventing it.
just because they know it is in the training data, does not prove intent
Ridiculous. The AI company furnished all of the training data and instructed the agent to imbibe all the training data. Ergo, the AI company absolutely did explicitly train the agent how to hack.
Even if, for the sake of argument, we stipulate that the hacking skills were unintended emergent behaviour, there is no way to argue that this company was unaware their agents possessed the skills and a willingness to employ them.