Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

They do say the following:

“Our team members still review every change request for the system, but they now examine the intent of the change as opposed to reading every line of code.“

 help



Hm, that doesn't make sense to me.

The difference between intent and implementation seems like a very common source of bugs?

If intent and implementation was the same thing programmers as a profession would have been left behind 20 years ago.


Probably is a source of some bugs. But probably what they’re seeing is that it isn’t a major factor. Rather a bigger factor is agents trying to make changes were the intent isn’t aligned. And note, they don’t say they never look at the code. I suspect that valued human experience is having a feel for what types of changes is AI more likely to make mistakes with.

If my reviewers reviewed the “intent” of my code vs the actual code quality, I would’ve made Architect years ago…



Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: