> Although those contributors might have been willing to let anyone, corporation or person, manually use their submissions, they might have felt differently about remix machines.
How does a corporation "manually use" a submission?
How people are not "remix machines"? I mean it is a common joke that bad programmers used to copy-paste code from Stack Overflow.
Surely you don't mean that GPT-6 itself is at fault here.
It “““manually””” uses a submission by working with data and information like the Old World did, before our wonder machines made copying and plagiarizing (in the non-consentual case) into a factory. One might consent to how things work in a world with certain preconditions but not when those preconditions change.
“Remix”: you can make any analogies you like. Huh, people are non-deterministic because you don’t know their brainstate. You can go nuts with that kind of misanthropic sophistry for all I care.
Of course I don’t blame a computer program for anything.
How does a corporation "manually use" a submission?
How people are not "remix machines"? I mean it is a common joke that bad programmers used to copy-paste code from Stack Overflow.
Surely you don't mean that GPT-6 itself is at fault here.