Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Actually they sat a highly illustrious group of mathematicians down to advise them before releasing -- illustrious enough that I am certain that they have more global standing than you do to make a good call. That group advised open release, which is what they are doing. It lets mathematicians interested and skilled in each area look at what we have. It is by no means irresponsible.
 help



Have you actually read the AGMAI or AHM releases?

https://agmai.org/statement-oct6/

https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2026/10/07/ahm-statement-on-o...

You can appeal to authority all you want, but you should actually read the opinion of the authority you're appealing to.


Yes, yes I have.

> If AI labs produce significant mathematical results, they should responsibly release the results, as outlined in this document, as soon as possible.

And

> only the mathematical community can undertake the assessment that is needed. Making this work public is a first step. This release is the beginning, not the completion, of the process of human understanding and the incorporation of the work into mathematical knowledge.

This is precisely what I was saying.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: