Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It doesn't have to be "not free speech" to be deleterious, that's an insane argument.

A large part of how human settle on opinions and beliefs is by inference from what and how often is said around them, calibrated around in-person interactions.

Social media warp this horribly both through algorithmically selecting what information to present users with, and through impersonal "big account->user" that remove the stakes normally present in in-person communication, which completely breaks our perception of how important statements actually are.

 help



> It doesn't have to be "not free speech" to be deleterious, that's an insane argument.

I didn't say that. My point is that you need to tolerate "deleterious speech" in a democracy.

If you disagree, you should just admit that you don't believe in democracy. Which is a perfectly respectable position.


>you need to tolerate "deleterious speech" in a democracy.

Why? You can have a democracy without the right to free speech.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: