On: One person can now be a quorum at the SEC

[throw0101a]

> Definitely has nothing to do with SCOTUS's retirement accounts, no sir.

Who needs retirement accounts when you can just accept gifts-do-not-call-them-bribes?

* https://www.propublica.org/article/clarence-thomas-scotus-un...

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarence_Thomas#Nondisclosure_...

[toast0 → throw0101a]

It's just a gratiuty, not a bribe if payment comes after the act:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snyder_v._United_States