"Currently known" by whom? The contract is that the "man in the street" does not ask to adhere to its twisted dictionary, and I let it live. When something esoteric in Academia reaches the mainstream news, "Alarm!" and extra care.
["Classical deterministic"] AI is "simulation of intelligence". That it "is" or not is not a problem: the validity of the output counts.
The Discipline of AI is about the relation between computing and intelligence.
A statement about AI [systems] being intelligent or not, or being capable of becoming intelligent or not, requires support.
An «Artificially Intelligent [Entity]» is still an "AI system".
Please, please fix your language. (Then, you may want to present the info and insight.)