Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Google any of these terms to see examples of people who were actually fined for speech in France, after 1950, and well after the 18th century:

- Hervé Eon Sarkozy fine

- Éric Zemmour 3000 fine

- bardot degenerates 20000

- Je me sens Charlie Coulibaly fine

None of these were threats or incitement to violence. Just insults.

And you talk about a constitutional right to free speech since the 18th century, but mocking Catholicism could be prosecuted until 1881 (i.e. in the 19th century).

 help



it's perhaps debatable, but the European (and French) legal frameworks do not recognize hate speech as protected free speech, so I suppose the concern (e.g. in the Bardot case) is if it was hate speech or not. Americans also do not support hate speech, though perhaps the way these are handled legally are different. I don't think this kind of exception is fairly applied to discredit what I wrote.

I said France does not have free speech, and gave an example of someone who was fined for holding up a small sign with the words "Casse-toi, pov'con" ("Get lost, you sad jerk").

If someone in France is not free to hold a sign that says "Get lost, you sad jerk" then France does not have free speech. That sign contains only words. It does not create any threat. It does not incite anyone to take illegal and/or violent actions.

Regarding the Bardot case you say "I don't think this kind of exception is fairly applied to discredit what I wrote" but:

- that's not the only case I cited, and

- even in the Bardot case, what's the rationale for suppressing speech expressing an opinion? it seems she was prosecuted because her expression of an opinion might cause others to adopt that same opinion. She wasn't inciting violence or illegal acts.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: