Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That's a good observation, though I'd say here that two things could be true at the same time. But, I do personally believe that most of the reported nerfing is the case of your chart + latent evidence-less complaining. Honeymoon phases are real.
 help



> Honeymoon phases are real

You can't just dismiss something backed by careful measurements by throwing a truism at it. What is this honeymoon phase? Can you quantify it? If not, how are you sure it's real?


Where are these careful measurements? Are you 100% sure they don't change the harness between runs and have a large enough sample size to be statistically significant?

All great questions you’re invited to ask the author. I was specifically responding to the “honeymoon phase” allegations and hand waving.

Fair enough, but if you can't answer them, you can arguably not use their work to support your point either.

I assume good faith

Methodological mistakes can and do happen despite good faith.

I'm not sure I'm arguing what you think I'm arguing. I'm not arguing against measurements. I'm saying that it's relevant to recall that honeymoon phases exist in the general human behavior, whether it applies here or not.



Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: