Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>specific example of a hybrid that gets worse mileage than a comparable non-hybrid ICE I'd love to hear it

How about one of the e-power nissans from the article?

https://www.automobile-catalog.com/car/2025/3381665/nissan_x...

https://www.automobile-catalog.com/car/2018/2605130/nissan_x...

 help



So if you compare a diesel to a petrol-hybrid, and you use the diesel's NEDC rating and compare it to the hybrid's WLTP rating, then number bigger!

Lets make a real comparison: The NEDC combined rating for the 2025 e-POWER is 5.4l/100km (FWD). The 2018 diesel version you linked uses 5.6l/100km, and the petrol 2018 version uses 6.2l/100km.

For a truly fair comparison you could have looked at the non-e-power versions from 2025, which come in at 7.4l/100km.


e-POWER listed data is massaged NEDC rating. Real life users report closer to 7L combined cycle for 2025 e-POWER model, and it goes all the way to 10L pure long highway driving (no recuperation). In contrast diesel model does the sticker mileage.



Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: