Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That is the null hypothesis, yes. Do you have evidence otherwise?


A good portion of people hate A.I. and won't even use it...they won't use a computer program to enhance their intellience, much less taking a pill...


This is an inference, not evidence. It doesn't meet my epistemic standard necessary to reject the null hypothesis.


Good for you. But you introduced this statement:

> AI-developed nootropics and germline editing will saturate human intelligence across individuals.

This is a forum, not a Bayesian-updating machine. So common courtesy is for you to take up the burden of proof for your own statements. Why do you think this is the null?




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: