Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm torn on this. While I can imagine Meta being morally corrupt enough to do all of this, I just can't imagine an exec taking on personal liability for the company.
 help



When they start torrenting on residential IP addresses and bring the content to work to train their AI, they should be.

That's a lot of ifs. Equally likely that the guy was just running a seedbox.

I don't believe, but this feels a bit like:

"Hey... we need to improve our porn detection AI... but we want to avoid paying for all that porn... is anyone open to taking on some personal liability for a nice bonus this year"

I'm just saying... maybe...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: