Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is just simply and profoundly wrong.

This is a prole leftist take and proles by definition are very ignorant and don’t understand elites or what they’re seeing (if someone could they would be an elite). A prole leftist is basically just a sad walking disaster that is angry and wants free stuff and wants others to suffer. They’re not engaging with leftism on an intellectual level, they’re not romantically captivated by it.

As far as mass murder goes, generally speaking the purpose of the Great Leap Forward, the French Revolution, the Russian Revolution and other types of leftist movements isn’t to kill massive amounts of people but that is a very common result of putting progressive ideas into action.



You're incorrect and historically inaccurate. Using the US military is not a leftist position, it's imperialism.

> don’t understand elites or what they’re seeing (if someone could they would be an elite

You can't become and elite through observation. You have to be born into it, or successfully do the bidding of those who are. Even then, you'd only be "new money".

> Great Leap Forward, the French Revolution, the Russian Revolution

None of these extend beyond the borders of the nation in question. That's my point, imperialism is not and never has been leftist.

I'm not a prole nor an elite, I am however a leftist and I assure you that neither the Democrats or The New York Times are even remotely leftist. They're right wing neo-liberals.


Leftism and “imperialism” are orthogonal concepts. “Imperialism” isn’t even a thing, it just basically means “conquering other land” or “imposing your views/culture”.


Imperialism is definitely a thing and it indeed means conquering other land. It's not orthogonal to leftism at all. Lenin literally called it the "highest stage of capitalism".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperialism#Definition


The USSR practiced “imperialism” by definition, forced deportations, annexations of territories.

Again, “imperialism” is just conquering territory + negative valence. It’s not actually a thing itself, it’s some other actual thing + It feels bad/it’s against my interests. There are lots of words used in political discourse that are like this. It’s just juvenile nonsense.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: