Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

As a Mercurial fanboy, git took off thanks to being from Linus, and a requirement to contribute to the Linux kernel, from there the adoption wind was in motion.
 help



As someone who was a mercurial fanboy too, critical element was that Github happpened for git while mercurial had nothing comparable - and before anyone points at bitbucket, it fucking sucked in UX

Yet UX wasn't a problem for Git adoption.

It was huge problem for Git adoption, that's why I mentioned GitHub

EDIT: GitHub had probably the first UX where I actually liked what I got, compared to various earlier git based ones, or the horrible CVS and SVN ones where clicking on a file name definitely didn't do what you expected.

I barely remember Bitbucket from the mercurial era but I do recall that while it was better than some, it was still worse than GitHub, whose "here's default branch's HEAD, plus auto-opened and formatted README" was really a game changer


As an ex BitKeeper fanboy with a history all the way to RCS, Git was just better.

Better than Bitkeeper maybe.

I also have used plenty of SCM systems since mid-90's.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: