Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

>By taking down Instagram now we'll send a clear message that taking liberties with our privacy and personal identity and likeness is /not acceptable/.

I call BS. Having already accepted the Patriot Act, mass domestic surveillance, phone taps without a warrant, most of our data in Google/Facebook/MS/Apple/Dropbox/Amazon clouds, etc, we're now supposed "send a clear message that taking liberties with our privacy and personal identity and likeness is /not acceptable/."???

It's the opposite: few things have been MORE acceptable by american society than companies and governments taking liberties with our privacy and personal identity.

Sending a message to Instagram? It's like being inside a burning house and we respond by stomping on our cigarette.




pretoriusB: It sounds that you are a victim of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learned_helplessness


No -- but you might be responding to something I have NOT said.

I'm not against action. I'm for action where it _matters_.

Abandoning all those really relevant privacy fronts and then "sending a message" to ...Instagram, is not it.

That's what I tried to convey with my "stomping the cigarette" analogy. Better try to put down the house fire first...


You make a seriously excellent point!




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: