Ai generate with human in the loop, so hard to say it’s not while also saying it’s terrible.
Definitely the fact that I have ai makes it more fesable for me to actually publish something rather than spednign years on copy I can spend time on code and outsource copy
The only way to get better at writing is by writing.
I’d rather read a less polished but clearly human written article than something clearly written by AI. If I can’t tell I can’t tell.
Use it for editing or as a review but the weird hyperbolic AI stuff makes me instantly close an article. I barely got past the intro:
ONE ATTRIBUTE. EXACT BEHAVIOR.
The markup says what happens.
Start with local behavior. Add the server only when the interaction needs to cross the wire. The attribute is moo= — in case you were wondering what the ox says.
Your onto something here, thanks - the title and the section where the things I’ve spent more time on than the rest
I mean this „ Behavior, right where it happens.
moo= for reactive signals and ordinary JavaScript on the element itself. Datastar SSE when the interaction has to cross the wire and patch HTML and state.”
Still feels bad but I know I went trhu it couple of times.
Not so much with the new sample you give here.
I only shared because it might very well be cool stuff but if people are tired of AI writing and close it like me then it’s a lost opportunity. Not publishing at all is a bigger loss though, so it’s a tricky balance.
Agree. AI generated is not bad if it's well directed and audited in a loop by a human in good detail. I won't discard a project because a tool has been used. That's extremism. I'll take a look at the project first.
Hope you’ll like it. At least concepts, I know htmx live or datastar are more mature so there’s no discussion about it.
Would you have any hints what to avoid for „next time”?
Should I just make this absurdly small and make much less polished approach even for this kind of project?
Honest question. Will try to work on anything you suggest <3
