This is really interesting. I have felt for the past couple years that the moldability of Common Lisp lends agents the appropriate affordances to “do the right thing” via experimentations.
I see there is a section on RLMs; have you ran Autolith via agentic benchmarks? I would love to see comparisons with Prime Agent.
We have not done that yet, it's one of the major priorities. Autolith implements RLM a bit differently than Prime Agent (although it both comes from the same paper):
In Autolith, the top level agent is traditional, but has RLM tools which it can use for the things RLM is good at, namely exploratory work, processing a lot of files at once, backward context research and so on.
