> “We will be a minority in our homeland by 2066” is accurate
Accurate as in someone said it? Centuries ago, people were worried that if the number of horses increased at the current rate, we would be waist-deep in horse manure.
And you admit yourself that the "precise number is contentious".
> Accurate as in someone said it? Centuries ago, people were worried that if the number of horses increased at the current rate..
"Someone" being a population expert. Of course, "if we do nothing about it" is implied - if nothing could be done, why even bring it up? But of course you know this, and stretching a best estimate prediction by an expert to somehow qualify as "disinformation" is not arguing in good faith.
> And you admit yourself that the "precise number is contentious".
The man jailed did not state any number, and was not in jail for getting the number wrong, so that objection is irrelevant. I only add the caveat to avoid an argument about the number that the source cited.
Accurate as in someone said it? Centuries ago, people were worried that if the number of horses increased at the current rate, we would be waist-deep in horse manure.
And you admit yourself that the "precise number is contentious".