Why not make your URLs responsive?

[duck]

http://responsiveurl.co.uk/while/were/making/every/damn/thing/responsive/lets/not/forget/the/url/

[k3n]

I liked the use of progressive responsiveness!

    0.  http://responsiveurl.co.uk/while/were/making/every/damn/thing/responsive/lets/not/forget/about/the/url/
    1.  http://responsiveurl.co.uk/while/were/making/everything/responsive/lets/not/forget/the/url/
    2.  http://responsiveurl.co.uk/while/were/making/everything/responsive/dont/forget/the/url/
    3.  http://responsiveurl.co.uk/were/making/everything/responsive/dont/forget/the/url/
    4.  http://responsiveurl.co.uk/making/everything/responsive/dont/forget/the/url/
    5.  http://responsiveurl.co.uk/making/everything/responsive/dont/forget/url/
    6.  http://responsiveurl.co.uk/making/responsive/dont/forget/url/
    7.  http://responsiveurl.co.uk/responsive/dont/forget/url/
    8.  http://responsiveurl.co.uk/responsive/url/
    9.  http://responsiveurl.co.uk/rspnsv/url/
    10. http://responsiveurl.co.uk/
    11. http://rspnsvurl.co.uk/

[bluetidepro]

I got a quick laugh from this, especially that the demo actually worked! However, as the blog post mentioned, for the love of god people, do not do this for real. Haha

[ckluis]

Terrible idea, but I could see someone implementing a version of this which displays:

url.com/123455

www.url.com/long/longer/longest/url-structure

for mobile vs desktop in an application.

It makes me shudder.

[larrysmoustache]

So much for "Uniform"