On: The whole premise of checking for human writing is daft

[andy99 → auggierose]

Nothing personal, if someone told me they’d generated a 15 page paper based on a two week LLM discussion I wouldn’t want to read it at all. My prior is that it would be the result of some sycophantic echo chamber that the LLM had reinforced.

Edit: missed your insult in the first read, I wouldn’t have replied if I’d realized the first comment was in bad faith but will leave the above for posterity.

[auggierose → andy99]

That's fine. This is a statement about yourself, not me.

[pastel8739 → auggierose]

If you’re working on it for 2 weeks, why not just write it yourself (perhaps chatting with an AI on the side to develop your thoughts)?

[auggierose → pastel8739]

Because it is more efficient, of course. Same reason why I use Codex/Claude Code for programming, and not only the chat window.