Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

From the abstract:

"Assuming [assumptions] we show that ... can in principle solve..."

Yeah, well, you know... that doesn't sound as promising as the title.

 help



Assuming X is true, that implies Y. We don't think Y is true therefore we now doubt that X is true, is a very standard thing to do in math.

Yes, but the title suggests that "[method] solves NP-complete problems", and sounds kind of like "Quantum-Physics-related trick solves NP-complete problems".

Moreover - it doesn't even solve NPC problems conditionally, but that show that "in principle" they should be / would be solvable.


That's the whole point of the article:

"We show [Assuming {competing physics theory} then {P = NP}]"

(or something along the lines)

"But we actually think P != NP... so [Assuming {P != NP} then {competing physics theory} cant be true]"


Shocking..



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: