Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Steve, I agree with you that this is a lot of change for something in preview, but didn't Rails 3 have some last minute changes before its release as well, and 3.1 was a big jump also?

Matz, Shugo, and Charlie will figure it out soon enough, but it is interesting. What is more upsetting to me really is the version number. 2.0 implies some major changes, but 1.9 was more major. It should be 1.10, and then they should work on something more revolutionary for 2.

There is a lot of pressure on Matz also. They really need to spend more time on it.




> didn't Rails 3 have some last minute changes before its release as well, and 3.1 was a big jump also?

I'm not sure about 'last minute,' but yes, 3.1 was a big jump. Rails doesn't follow SemVer, neither does Ruby.

> They really need to spend more time on it.

This is absolutely true, and is my biggest complaint.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: