On: Open source AI must win

[sho → dakolli]

I don't think insulting people is a great way to contribute. Not everyone who sees things differently than you has "psychosis".

Your reflexively negative comments on anything relating to AI are as insight-free as they are numerous; it's all just vague shitting-on without even a hook or argument that could be engaged with and debated. It's pretty tiring, honestly. If you really think your point of view is valuable and others should pay attention to it, rather than just filtering it out like the trollish noise it usually is, why don't you put a little more effort in?

[dakolli → sho]

I'll do better fo sho

[kamaal → dakolli]

Its the closest terminology we have to describe that process.

https://github.com/cobusgreyling/loop-engineering

Its hard to come up with new names for novel processes, you mostly reuse what is close enough and well known.

[dakolli → kamaal]

Loop engineering, whatever that is, is obviously just a way to get people to increase the amount of tokens required per task/request. They did the same thing with Ralph loops, they just need more revenue. Just write your code and use it to search and clarify, it can't build that magical thing you think it can.

[kamaal → dakolli]

The heuristic is this-

Given a problem P-

1. Provide a list(S) of solutions(S1, S2 ... SN) ordered in the most efficient(For some definition of efficiency) implementation means possible.

2. Execute S1, ... SN.

3. If P is fixed by a solution in the list, halt.

4. Else for each S1 ... SN , execute steps 1 through 4 until, all dependencies and sub problems are resolved to eventually solve P.

This obviously needs lots of tokens, which is all the more reason why we need AI to run locally on our machines.