> "The version of Textadept for the terminal requires only ncurses."
I suppose that would fit?
I notice that some keyboard bindings[1] are different in "Terminal"-mode (I suspect that means in terminal on GNU/Linux and possibly *BSD, but I suppose it might include MS Windows cmd.com (if supported) and OS X Terminal as well) -- as compared to the GUI-variants (MS Windows and OS X appear to just substitute control for command - while the "Terminal"-variant uses e.g. meta-control-n, rather than just meta-n or control-n for new file).
I think I'll stick with VIM, thanks. Still having another powerful editor available isn't a bad thing.
I notice that some keyboard bindings[1] are different in "Terminal"-mode (I suspect that means in terminal on GNU/Linux and possibly *BSD, but I suppose it might include MS Windows cmd.com (if supported) and OS X Terminal as well) -- as compared to the GUI-variants (MS Windows and OS X appear to just substitute control for command - while the "Terminal"-variant uses e.g. meta-control-n, rather than just meta-n or control-n for new file).
I think I'll stick with VIM, thanks. Still having another powerful editor available isn't a bad thing.
[1] http://foicica.com/textadept/api/_M.textadept.keys.html#Key....