This is what counts as front-page material? Here is a question for cringely: maybe the chart is only designed to show subjective differences and the people who made the chart concluded the scaling by diameter instead of area was a better option?
And based on this flimsy evidence you denounce the entire fscking industry? Does that make any logical sense to anybody who has spent more than a nanosecond giving any serious thought to this?
This is what counts as front-page material? Here is a question for cringely: maybe the chart is only designed to show subjective differences and the people who made the chart concluded the scaling by diameter instead of area was a better option?
And based on this flimsy evidence you denounce the entire fscking industry? Does that make any logical sense to anybody who has spent more than a nanosecond giving any serious thought to this?
How arrogant can you get.