> But it doesn't seem right to me to term themselves "trial monitors" when they seem pretty plainly biased for one side of the trial
We don't say that "human rights monitors" need to draft a few brutal dictators in order to provide a balanced take on genocide...
I'm not sure why "trial monitors" would suggest such a lack of bias either. Monitoring organisations are explicitly setup to ensure that a minority group under threat from a superior power are getting a fair shake.
We don't say that "human rights monitors" need to draft a few brutal dictators in order to provide a balanced take on genocide...
I'm not sure why "trial monitors" would suggest such a lack of bias either. Monitoring organisations are explicitly setup to ensure that a minority group under threat from a superior power are getting a fair shake.