Hacker News new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

I did not understand everything in the article, but if Haskell has solved all these problems already, why isn't everyone jumping ship en masse to functional programming? Surely there must be a better reason than "It's too hard for programmers"?

We don't have that many cores yet. The biggest servers have 64, some phones have 4. That's all within a range where we can parallelize by running different processes on different cores without changing our code.

I guess we will see more urgency in a couple of years when hundereds of cores are going to be the norm. At that point software that makes use of those cores will pull away from software that doesn't.

I'm not saying functional programming will be the answer but it could be. I don't think it's that difficult to grasp.

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact