If it takes a few thousand pages of textbooks or other reference material to gain competence with a given topic how is consuming superficial summaries provided by AI expected to produce comparable results?
> If it takes a few thousand pages of textbooks or other reference material to gain competence
This is a huge assumption and not one I’m sure holds up. In my experience gaining competence is often more a matter of hands on experimentation and experience, and the thousands of pages of reference material are there to get you to the point where you can start getting hands on experience, and debug your experiments when they don’t work. If AI can meaningfully cut back on that by more efficiently getting people to the experimentation stage, it absolutely will be more effective. And so far in my limited experience, it seems extremely promising.
Uh yeah, no. For all of the same reasons that Cliff Notes do not stack up against actually reading the assigned literature. For all of the same reasons that skimming search results to win lazy arguments online doesn't stack up against an actual formal education on whatever the argument is about. For all of the same reasons an hour of Youtube University doesn't produce the same outcomes as a decade of experience working in the trades. See the pattern?
