Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> "...if they had seen Mozilla making the financial moves that would have made it an independent and self-sufficient entity."

Does their endowment fund enable them to be an independent and self-sufficient entity?

In other words, Can they live off it in perpetuity?





The question is if their endowment can fund a competitive independent web browser in perpetuity. Looking at other web browsers suggests no.

Let's start with the acknowledgement of carouseling.

There's nothing to acknowledge. You're asking everyone to accept the presumption embedded in the statement that a billion dollars "goes away quickly when you're a large company paying lots of money to salaries", namely that Mozilla should be a large company and should rely on a steady stream of outside money instead of seeking sustainable financial independence. But Mozilla's lack of focus and excessive spending on side projects is a major part of the complaints against Mozilla, and you aren't even trying to make a reasonable case that Mozilla needs to be spending money like that.

I don't understand how what you're accusing me of pertains to anything I've written here today.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: