Your logic is simply broken.
WIPO makes 3000+ UDRP decisions a year. Some will be right, some will be wrong. This is just reality. It has nothing to do with whether "there is some truth to what you said". Correlation does not imply causation.
If you appeal a WIPO decision in front of some judge who doesn't know a thing about the internet and that judge rules in your favor, you have not just proven WIPO made a mistake - but that is how you are choosing to interpret his decision.
You're clearly a typo-squatter or somebody who otherwise traffics in TM domains, so I'm never going to get you to agree with me on this, and that is fine, we don't need to agree. But your personal attacks are unnecessary.
Yes, I traffic in thousands of TM domains.
It's not that i'm a corporate IP lawyer who has dealt with a lot of these situations before (only on the fighting typo-squatters side, hilariously enough), and so my view is more nuanced than yours.
Instead, i'm just a typo squatter.
