Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't understand this at all. What fundamental limitation of a mother prevents her from operating on her son?




It can be emotionally hard to cut into your own kid or to witness them go into a critical situation.

AFAIK, there's no actual limitation that prevents this, but just a general understanding that someone non-related to the patient would be able to handle the stress of surgery better.


I get that but that would be the case regardless of whether the surgeon was the mother or father.

The original riddle goes something like this

> A father and son were in a car accident where the father was killed. The ambulance brought the son to the hospital. He needed immediate surgery. In the operating room, a doctor came in and looked at the little boy and said I can't operate on him he is my son. Who is the doctor?

The riddle is literally just a play on "women can't be surgeons."


Thanks for providing the whole riddle. Now it makes sense.

It's a classic riddle from the late 20th century when surgeons were rarely female.

But what does the prevalence of women being surgeons have to do with a female surgeon being unable to operate on her son?

It is generally considered unethical for medical doctors to treat family members.

That would be the case regardless of the sex of the parent.

In the original riddle the boy's dad dies in the accident before the boy arrives at the hospital.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: