Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's not really about optimism or pessimism, it's effect vs no effect. Self reported anecdotes like yours abound, but as far as I'm aware the effect isn't real. That is, it's not in fact true that if a business buys AI tools for its developers their output will increase in some way that impacts the business meaningfully. So while you may feel more productive using AI tooling, in fact you probably aren't, actually.




If there was no effect we wouldn't be seeing so many mass layoffs and people complaining about this job market being worst than even dot com crash.

No. If you're trying to make a causal link between some layoffs and AI tooling you need to bring the receipts. Show that the layoffs were caused by AI tooling, don't just assume it. I don't think you can, or that anyone has.

Most public companies aren't attributing it to AI yet due to fear of backlash, but it's obvious to most of us.

And Startups and SMB's are more open to attributing it to efficiency gains due to AI.

If you aren't seeing it then probably it's because you are in a niche vertical. Which is great for you, but not representative on the whole.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: