On: A graph explorer of the Epstein emails

[pohl]

Could you explain how “no confirmed meeting” implies “they never met”?

[theultdev → pohl]

You think he snuck out from secret service and had an off-the-book thanksgiving with a pedo?

I'm saying there's no direct evidence he did and on face value it's ridiculous.

He was meeting the troops and golfing with Tiger Woods and happened to be in the same state Epstein had a house in.

Have any evidence otherwise, or just conspiracy theories?

[pohl → theultdev]

With any other administration I would have granted you that leap in logic, but we already learned, three years ago, from Stephanie Grisham that he held off the books meetings specifically to circumvent record keeping laws. So I think a slightly higher standard of evidence is needed before we dismiss the possibility that he met with the pedo who likely had dirt on him.

[theultdev → pohl]

You have the standard of evidence reversed.

You need to prove what you're accusing him of, not the other way around.

[pohl → theultdev]

Sounds like you’re assuming that standards for charges/trial should also be used as standards for inquiry/investigation. That is not the case.

[theultdev → pohl]

By all means investigate away on the thanksgiving email, you will find nothing as nothing exists.

Choosing resources to investigate hearsay that is easily disproven is a waste of time though when you have actual evidence of direct correspondence.

Noone is falling for this crap anymore btw. The Trump smear stuff doesn't work as everyone cried wolf too many times.

Very telling you spend this much energy on a silly email talking about Trump vs people who actually talked and met with Epstein.

[pohl → theultdev]

Are you Donald? How can you be certain that nothing exists?

[theultdev → pohl]

> Epstein and pohl are down here in Florida

Wow that's damning pohl, prove you weren't with him.

Even if you provide detailed logs of your whereabouts, that won't be enough because I assume you're lying.

Hearsay is a bitch isn't it.