Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's easy to test, therefore there is no need to test it? I don't see how that follows. If you haven't tested it then you haven't tested it.


> therefore there is no need to test it?

What evidence do you have that it wasn't tested? Or are you just making an assumption based on one article? Did you do any follow up searching? It might have led you to this:

https://www.neowin.net/news/mozilla-under-fire-for-firefox-a...


Which says.

Update (August 13, 2025, 03:57 GMT): While the community correctly identified a performance issue, their attribution of the cause was mistaken.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: