HN is supposed to foster discussion and curiosity. I presented arguments to attempt to show that what Musk wrote is a least a plausible scenario (and the LSE link shows that this is taken seriously), whatever will actually happen (so "inevitable" is probably the interesting aspect to debate), whatever I think of Musk, and whatever I think of those issues in general. You keep being dangerously close to simply trolling...
You were presenting talking points from the racist "great replacement" conspiracy theory and hoping that no-one notices. They did and it was flagged out. This is not coherent argument, it is inflammatory rhetoric.
> the rise of Islam ... riots caused by this instability.
Oh, the Muslims were rioting were they? Is that what you're saying?
Funny that you don't blame the riots on the people who were actually rioting. You make it sounds like it's inevitable and they had no choice. I reject that. You are using convoluted phrasing to obscure what is what.
> Musk made his comment during
Musk was not "making comment during", he was inciting further violence.
> You keep being dangerously close to simply trolling...
This is all very disingenuous, and so you do not deserve serious response. I am not obligated to debate civilly with extremists.
