It was a train originating in Doncaster and travelling on a Friday night, there’s an equal or greater chance it was a drunk and/or stoned white kid that calls everyone “bruv”.
He is saying so little in the video and just letting people speak. Asking a leftist to engage with an argument is like asking someone to glue a smashed chicken egg back together.
All the kings man and horses declared war on reality once more- as they had done when they declared war on economic reality, starving millions and deporting more. The madness of make believers.
It’s kind of funny how hateful and batshit terrified you are at the same time.
And I’d be happy to glue that egg back together for you, except I’m still trying to figure out why you just smashed it all up in your own grill like that.
Phew I’m so glad it wasn’t terror related. Just two random men, born in Britain, who went on a stabbing spree on a train for no reason at all. Calm down, right?
Oh, I’m sure there was a reason why one random dude tried to get himself killed by the armed police, but a) it wasn’t because he was a Muslim and b) it was, almost certainly, because he couldn’t get help for either his mental illness or his addiction issues because multiple generations of right wing governments have leeched all the NHS’s money into the hands of their Russian oligarch friends while distracting a gullible populace with tales of rampant knife crime and dangerous foreigners.
“Men dressed in black” describes about half the ambulatory Doncastrian population after 3PM on a Friday afternoon, they often travel in small groups to try and at assemble at least one complete set of genitals between them, and the terrorism task force gets called out to just about any mass casualty event in the UK since 2007.
Leaping to (especially racist) conclusions isn’t helping anyone.
You think stabbing people on trains is an accurate description of the behavior of Muslims as a religious group? If not, what is your point exactly? Prejudice against Muslims, or those perceived as Muslims, is often closely linked to racialised conceptions of them (see e.g. that adorable woman who thought that Obama was an ‘Arab’ back in the day). But anyway, if it’s not racism per se it’s just some other equally indefensible prejudice that we could well do without.
Well if I had started my comment with "Christians probably" a) far fewer downvotes for a thread that most people missed. b) People would be agreeing with me, for the most part, and c) it would have made zero sense.
As for "Jews Probably" show me a bunch of Jew lead terror attacks in germany that triggered WW2 - otherwise you're just calling everyone a nazi and a fascist again for no reason other than just trying not to be a "bad leftist".
I can’t show you a bunch of Jew-“lead” (sic) terror attacks in 1920s-30s Germany because the vast majority of them only existed within the fevered imagination of the actual Nazis and Fascists of the day, much as the vast majority of Islamic-led attacks in the UK since 2007 exist only in the fevered imagination of the would-be Nazis and Fascists of today.
Having undoubtedly spent way more time in Doncaster and on that specific train line than you, and having actually been in the UK with a functioning memory of events here, and having been a victim of the actually extremely small amount of violent crime here, I’m going to assume that this very centrist is much more well-informed on the matter than an actually and demonstrably racist individual engaging in overtly fascistic rhetoric.
And, as expected, police have now announced it was two British nationals, neither of them obviously Islamic, and no apparent or suspected link to any form of ideological terrorism.
I guess we're just waiting for a 3rd arrest at this point, if he survives the knife wound, for spreading the "Allahu Akbar" rumor yesterday. He'll get 50 to life.
No, I specifically didn’t, and apparently an inability to read English is amongst your other, let’s just say interesting, attributes.
When an ignorant idiot says “it was probably A” and then someone who actually knows the area says “actually, that’s the thinking of someone who is either ignorant or an idiot, because there’s an equal or better chance it was B” that someone isn’t saying “it was definitely B”, they’re saying the ignorant idiot is an ignorant idiot for assuming A… there’s also a significantly better chance it was C, D, E, or in the case of Doncaster and Peterborough several more letters up to W… my point in its entirety is that it takes an ignorant idiot to assume it was A.
Especially when it was not, in fact, someone motivated by Islam (or even a misreading of Islam). When this is all said and done it will almost certainly have been motivated by either alcohol, drugs, mental illness, or straightforward injured male pride, just like almost every other violent event in this country.
In more ignorant and idiotic countries he’d have had a gun. I’m glad I’ve moved somewhere he only had a knife, and most (if not all) of the injured will pull through.
