If I'm reading it right, I think the main conclusion from the Lucene patch was that using a straight "FOR" (Frame of Reference) approach was faster in the real world than using "PFOR" (Patched Frame of Reference), and only slightly worse in index size.
I haven't read this new paper yet, but would be interesting to compare and contrast the approaches.
If I'm reading it right, I think the main conclusion from the Lucene patch was that using a straight "FOR" (Frame of Reference) approach was faster in the real world than using "PFOR" (Patched Frame of Reference), and only slightly worse in index size.
I haven't read this new paper yet, but would be interesting to compare and contrast the approaches.