Paul has described the problem very well and he also made a habit of insisting a startup needs to solve a real problem.
Now, I wonder whether the understanding of both aspects is enough to put him in a position to recognize founders on the other side of the table capable to provide a solution to random black swan farming?
Eventually more interesting is the question what would be his best guess from which field of science he expects useful outcome enhancing the criteria to make more educated decisions on founders?
Am I alone with the impression the essay sounds stucked?
Now, I wonder whether the understanding of both aspects is enough to put him in a position to recognize founders on the other side of the table capable to provide a solution to random black swan farming?
Eventually more interesting is the question what would be his best guess from which field of science he expects useful outcome enhancing the criteria to make more educated decisions on founders?
Am I alone with the impression the essay sounds stucked?