It's funny how fascistic people want to destabilize and exploit other countries but not bear the consequence of having the now poor and desperate population migrating to the country they see as responsible for their misery.
We have the same in Europe with african immigration, we exploited these people for hundreds years, become rich on their backs and now some people want everyone out ? That's hypocrisy if I've ever seen any.
I mean for the refuges coming to the EU it often is that simple. But most of the refuges of countries systematic destabilized by the US for greed (often with the help of EU-countries, not always knowingly tho) end up in the EU not the US.
And the relationship between the US and many of the countries where most illegal immigrants in the US come from are a bit more complex.
That doesn't change that they (the politicians, not necessary the voter) have for years no only been quite fine with it (and publicly, too) but in some cases (e.g. stereotype Indian IT workers) outright goaded people to come to the US temporary and now are surprised that some staid longer then allowed and brought friends (which is pretty much the expected outcome when you consult history).
So IMHO they should take responsibility for it, and kicking everyone out by force at the cost of even hurting your own citizens isn't really a good way to solve that.
We have the same in Europe with african immigration, we exploited these people for hundreds years, become rich on their backs and now some people want everyone out ? That's hypocrisy if I've ever seen any.