This idea that you can arbitrarily switch between database X and database Y with radically different models is a really harmful fallacy. Code which attempts to ‘abstract away the details’ is often leaky, buggy, complex, and just as prone to tight coupling as any other solution.
At the very least, such has been my experience. And I think certain individuals have a policy of downvoting those comments they disagree with rather than explaining their counterpoints in a comment.
In my experience there isn't an issue. It all comes down to how well you design your application. Here's the interface to a service in a fun side project I'm currently working on (comments removed):
These methods implement some business rules, do some database work and throw a few messages onto a service bus. Why is it so hard to believe that the database implementation for any of these methods affects the consumers? Here's a sample implementation:
MongoDB has a completely different data model to PostgreSQL. You can't just build your app around one approach and then trivially move to another.
Pick the database for the data model not the other way around.