"I'd be happy to take "reasonable level of fidelity" + yes, the act of training itself as infringing to a jury"
They're not the same thing. At all. The comparatively few that are [extractable] should be fixed. I already said that.
The vast majority of texts CANNOT BE EXTRACTED. Are they still infringing?
At this stage, you can't just declare "infringing or not," thats the point of trials.
What I'm saying is -- you make good points -- but I like my chances in front of a jury with my explanation against yours.
Could be reversed by a higher court of course, but it seems like it establishes that pirating and training are two different "crimes". (Or three - see the bit about "infringing knock-offs").
"I'd be happy to take "reasonable level of fidelity" + yes, the act of training itself as infringing to a jury"
They're not the same thing. At all. The comparatively few that are [extractable] should be fixed. I already said that.
The vast majority of texts CANNOT BE EXTRACTED. Are they still infringing?